RESUMO
Introduction: Patient satisfaction is important tool to monitor health care performance and quality of health plans, emphasizing effective counseling and consent processes. The objective of the study is to assess patient satisfaction and anxiety with the use of NSQIP surgical risk calculator in comparison to standardized questionnaires. Methodology: This is an interventional prospective randomized study. Difference in patient satisfaction is assessed by a 7-point Likert scale and anxiety assessment by 5-point Likert scale of Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) questionnaire written in Nepalese. Satisfaction scores were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA), or the Kruskal-Wallis test. P- value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Satisfaction score regarding comfort during counseling and consent process was similar with and without use of NSQIP surgical risk calculator (83.3 % and 76.9 %, respectively). Satisfaction score regarding plan of anesthesia was 63.33 % with the use of NSQIP and 53.8 % without NSQIP tool. 30.76 % of patients with high school education developed negative feelings following counseling when NSQIP tool was not used (p value 0.002). NSQIP usage increased anxiety about anesthesia and surgery and led to higher continual thinking about the procedure.Duration of counseling was 12 min with NSQIP tool use in comparison to 9.67 min following conventional counseling (p value 0.047). Conclusion: NSQIP surgical risk calculator is a reliable tool that can be used alongside conventional methods during preoperative period for decision-making and counseling with similar satisfaction scores but a higher incidence of anxiety and continual thinking about procedures.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Aluminum phosphide is a very common suicide agent in developing countries like Nepal. Due to the unavailability of a specific antidote, mortality is very high because the phosphine molecule that is formed leads to inhibition of the cytochrome oxidase enzyme system in mitochondria. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation provides life-saving support to the cardiovascular and respiratory systems until the deadly poison is eliminated from the body. CASE PRESENTATION: We encountered one case of 67-year-old Asian woman, a known case of major depressive disorder, who presented to our center with suicidal ingestion of aluminum phosphide with cardiovascular and respiratory dysfunction. On presentation in our emergency room, she had an ejection fraction of 20% and had to be immediately intubated for respiratory failure. Based on the evidence of almost 100% mortality with aluminum phosphide poisoning, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was initiated in our intensive care unit. Her general condition and hemodynamics gradually improved over the course of 2 days and she was weaned from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and ventilator by post-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation days 3 and 4, respectively. After psychiatric evaluation and establishment of normal vital parameters, she was moved out of intensive care unit on post-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation day 6 and discharged to home on post-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation day 10. CONCLUSIONS: Although this seems to be a small step in terms of global perspective, it is a giant stride for a developing country. The management of reversible but severe cardiac and respiratory failure certainly opens up newer scopes where we can ensure a quality health care service being made accessible even to the most underprivileged people.